Tuesday, July 10, 2001

Raffi Hovannisian's letter to the editor (below) about the article I posted really expresses what I was thinking too. Hugh Pope really twisted what was hours of conversation to suit the article he had already decided to write. Regarding Zabel, my girlfriend, he wrote that her grandmother urged her "to someday rebuild the family's crushed homeland". She definitely NEVER said "crushed". So why would he add it? When Zabel was growing up, Armenia was a Soviet Republic and was strong, so why would Hugh put those words in her mouth? Then he goes on to quote one of the most negative things she said the entire evening in which she was mostly talking about the positive here... and to top it all off, he seems to imply that her "falling in love" (which was never said at all) accounted for her staying here, when in fact she had decided to stay here before there was anything at all between us. Just another example of how you should not believe everything you read.


RAFFI K. HOVANNISIAN TO THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
July 9, 2001

Dear Editor,
Hugh Pope's feature story (WSJ, July 6) on Armenia and the problem
of emigration underlines an alarming phenomenon of strategic
proportions for the Armenian republic, its people and
policymakers. Evidently poignant, the piece does not, however,
display the journalistic comprehensiveness that one has come to
expect from the writer.

The Armenian nation, having suffered conquest, genocide, and
partition over the years, has recently been given a special second
chance to forge a strong, democratic, sovereign state out of the
legacy of a painful past. Amid a variety of positive development
indicators, external realities such as military conflict,
blockades, and closed borders have combined with serious
shortcomings in leadership to create a crisis of public trust and
confidence. The political, socioeconomic, and psychological
subconditions prompting the exodus have resulted in a mixed record
of independent Armenia' s first decade.

The Young Turk leaders of the Ottoman Empire were responsible for
the great Armenian dispossession of 1915, which included all the
components of the crime of genocide the destruction of the historic
Armenian homelands, and the murderous finality for millions of
human lives. Modern-day Azerbaijan was responsible for unleashing,
and later losing, a war of aggression against the Armenian land of
Mountainous Karabagh. The perpetrators unfortunately evade
acceptance of responsibility yet eventually might mature toward
facing their history and themselves. But there still remains the
question: Who is to answer for the departure over the last ten
years of more than one million Armenian citizens from their very
own Republic of Armenia? Their interests in the matter aside,
certainly not Turkey or Azerbaijan, neither Russia nor the United States.
This issue and its resolution lie within. Yes, we are to blame. And
contrary to the prevalent tenor of Mr. Pope's article, Armenia and
her people can and will put their house in order, establish the
rule of law, empower the body politic, and demand accountable
government. They will find the courage and fortitude to call a
spade by its name, and they will turn the tide on emigration. For
this, the Armenians and their country must be able at once to
defend their rights in respect of ill-willing neighbors and their
transgressions and to exercise critical introspection in order to
face and then meet their many contemporary challenges, both foreign
and domestic.

These are but a few of the thoughts I expressed during a
comprehensive interview with the noted author, from which he
selected and put to print a couple of facially correct, but
textually misplaced and essentially incomplete soundbites that
apparently fit into the predetermined scheme of his story.

Raffi K. Hovannisian
Founding Director, Armenian Center for National and International Studies
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Armenia

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home